Comments on: Bernie’s Better Guide to Depth of Field for Geeks Who Want to be Digital Artists https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/ Various writings on software development and photography Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:19:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.11 By: Rory Melough https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-21881 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:02:06 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-21881 Cracking article – thank you!

]]>
By: Les https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-1002 Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:04:28 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-1002 Good article. But, I’d should like to clarify one point. . .
When you speak of measuring blur in the real world, you are not really measuring in the real world, but are extrapolating the amount of blur you see in the image to how large that would be given the actual size of the subject or object being blurred in the image. Is that correct?

]]>
By: Liza Q. Delgado https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-994 Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:37:36 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-994 i wanna ask again, how exactly do you get the value for the minimum circle of confusion? i kinda don’t get it. there’s the 0.2 mm, then the 25 cm, then suddenly there goes the 1/1250. please enlighten me! thanks vm

]]>
By: bernie https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-993 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:38:02 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-993 Good question. Depth of field is really a property that applies to optical systems and the images that they produce. Once you’ve edited an image or combined several images together then all statements about depth of field no longer have their strict technical meanings. You could go by aesthetics and say “This edited photo seems to have half the depth of field of the original”, but that’s a human judgement, not a technical statement.

]]>
By: Liza Q. Delgado https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-992 Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:40:30 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-992 hey! nice article. I was wondering though, can the blur still be measured when you already used a software on the image? example, helicon focus. or adobe photoshop. how can you say that it has a greater depth of field than the image which is not edited? you can’t just say it’s clearer, too. is there any way to measure depth of field when a software has already edited it?

]]>
By: NEW FEATURE - Photography Tutorials - Page 2 https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-991 Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:00:48 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-991 […] with pictures, diagrams, even mathematical equations, and a great sense of humour. There's more at Depth Of Field For Geeks on Bernie Sumption 85 – Understanding Depth in FieldThere seems to be a bit of a love affair with shallow depth of […]

]]>
By: 10 Great Resources to Help You Learn More About Photography – How to Freelance https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-990 Sat, 28 Apr 2012 05:48:44 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-990 […] BerniesĀ better guide to depth of field […]

]]>
By: » Photography Tutorials and Resource | Big Sun Photography https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-989 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:11:17 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-989 […] Bernies better guide to depth of field – This is hands down the best tutorial I've ever read on the subject of depth of field.  It is clear, concise and most of all, you really understand depth of field when it's done. […]

]]>
By: Alex https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-988 Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:47:37 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-988 Great article! It is suitable for anyone from beginners to those sophisticated guys.

]]>
By: Photographing couples - AF question - Page 2 https://blog.berniesumption.com/photography/depth-of-field-for-geeks/#comment-987 Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:12:13 +0000 http://berniesumption.com/photography/#comment-987 […] see, I've gone one step further and have put in subjects rather than sizes. Bernie's explanation: Bernie’s Better Guide to Depth of Field for Geeks Who Want to be Digital Artists | Bernie Sump… His table: A better depth of field table | Bernie Sumption :: Photography __________________ […]

]]>